The primary purpose of peer review is providing the Editor with the information needed to reach a fair, evidence-based decision that adheres to the journal’s editorial criteria. Review reports should also help authors revise their manuscript such that it may be accepted for publication. Reports accompanied by a recommendation to reject the paper should explain the major weaknesses of the research; this will help the authors prepare their manuscript for submission to a different journal.

Overall, a single manuscript should have at least two blind peer reviewers and the review process takes 10 days with a possibility of extension if the reviewers need more time. If the manuscript has major correction, the manuscript will be given for similar peer reviewers and or another new reviewer. The final decision will be made by the editor-in-chief of the journal including a submission for publication.

Overall, a single manuscript should have at least two blind peer reviewers and the review process takes 10 days with a possibility of extension if the reviewers need more time. If the manuscript has major correction, the manuscript will be given for similar peer reviewers and or another new reviewer. The final decision will be made by the editor-in-chief of the journal including a submission for publication.

For the detail information, see the journal editorial policy document.